![]() |
|
|
BOSLEGO RISK
SERVICES Robert Boslego Harvard College, BA Economics (Honors) Stanford Graduate School of Business, MBA hedging
Strategies for hedge Funds traditional
stock market valuation models have not been very effective for identifying
undervalued stocks or managing risk, as documented in
detail in the WSJ article, 'Macro' Forces in Market
Confound Stock Pickers.’ the “tidal wave” of macro
forces—the economy, political developments, and regulation—have produced large
equity draw-downs that just have not been predictable using valuation models. diversification
among stocks has not been an effective technique for managing risk over recent
years. Macro forces have caused stocks to move in lock-step, producing high
correlations among stocks. The success
of ETFs, where many stocks in a sector trade together regardless of relative
values, may have contributed to high correlations as well. These
traditional risk management methods have not been effective in preventing large
equity draw-downs in many portfolios. Most investors are not interested in
investment strategies that involve equity draw-downs of 30% or more. Furthermore, investors don’t want to pay
hedge fund fees for beta risk, and hedge fund indexes have had high
correlations to beta markets. The
risk management function and process is and should be separate and different
from the investment/trading function for many reasons. Here are a few of the challenges to maintaining objectivity:
Investors
want effective risk management. To deliver effective risk management, hedging
strategies must be designed, tested and implemented systematically and
consistently. Boslego
is uniquely qualified to develop effective hedging strategies for hedge funds,
according to the fund’s mandate and risk profile.
|
|
©2011 Boslego Risk Services. More. |